Marika
2024-07-16 02:05:26 UTC
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 01:46:10 -0400, 26yh.0712 says...
MAYBE HE’S THE FAKE MELANIA!!!”A Republican would have no reason to attack Trump.
Something kinda stinks here.
It's probably a ruse, perpetrated by Crooks, himself.Something kinda stinks here.
Although... there WERE similar circumstances surrounding Oswald and Kennedy.
Dead men tell no tales.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person
has been driven effectively insane due to their
dislike of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion.
The president-elect's every tweet provokes a
firestorm, as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language
consisting solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and
everything Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar
he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up
to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing -
not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that
would be received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president
was a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was
"the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal
people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very
existence of George W. Bush."
"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get
their news from one part of the political spectrum -
the gravest of all. They report that no matter how many times sufferers
in padded cells are presented with flash cards with
the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time, Newsweek, New York
Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain
unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."
(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part -
meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may
well have it.)
Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote
conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear
"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump
to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it.
Articles in respectable publications written by professors at elite
universities are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump
presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and may very well spell
doom for American civilization.
"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was
about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited.
Many more threatened to leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none
actually did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so
sad!"
The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump
defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies
as nothing more than the blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and
free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of
presidential derangement syndromes is a function of increased
polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at
work in the country today.
We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think
any differently than us. We watch cable news that
affirms what we already think. We read ideological "news" sites that tell
us how good our side is and how bad the other one
is. And on and on and on.
Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who
disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To
say that those who don't share our views are mentally deficient in some way?
What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the
standard response to those with whom you disagree is
that they must be crazy? Nothing good, for sure.
=====
Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have
speculated upon the mental health of President
Donald Trump. Indeed, over 70,000 people self-identifying as "mental
health professionals" have signed a petition declaring
that "Trump is mentally ill and must be removed." In sociological terms,
the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on
President Trump, and to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.
However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of
this "medical gaze." In fact, more and more people
are suggesting that this "medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused
on President Trump's most embittered and partisan
opponents. Some have even suggested that these opponents are experiencing
a specific mental condition-a condition which has
been labelled "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?
Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book
published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA)
known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth
Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and
lists hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is nowhere to be seen. Similarly,
a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE
and Google Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome.
Officially at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable,
or treatable mental disorder.
That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have
convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document.
Indeed, social scientists have long recognized that there are numerous
"folk categories" of mental disorders that are
considered real conditions by the general public, even though they are
not recognized as such in the DSM. These include
categories such as "burnout" or "nervous breakdown."
As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a
real mental condition.
Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"
There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk
category rather than a professional category. As
such, there is currently much armchair speculation about the nature and
existence of TDS, without consensus.
The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford
English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic
combination of opinions, emotions, or behavior." Several commentators
have run with this, putting forth suggestions about
opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS.
Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of
President Trump trigger some people into distorted
opinions, extreme emotions and hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer
Bernard Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples
of TDS among Trump's political opponents, including fainting, vomiting,
students retreating to "safe spaces" and others
demanding "therapy dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses
on opinions, language and cognition, writing in the
LA Times that "sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting of
hyperbole [leading to] a constant state of hysteria...
the afflicted lose touch with reality."
Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the
fainting and screaming characterizing American
Beatlemania in the 1960s. Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme
emotional reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not
based on adoration and admiration, but on fear and loathing.
Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a
malicious slur term used to discredit and
delegitimize criticism of President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris
Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: "The truth
is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who
view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing
more than blind hatred." Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem
is not TDS; our problem is Deranged Trump Self-
Delusion."
In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality
and existence of TDS.
Conclusion
The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists
spend considerable time and energy behind closed
doors pondering over the existence and reality of mental conditions. This
has led the APA to revise the DSM five times since
1952, considerably expanding the list of official mental disorders with
each revision. As far as I am aware, few
psychiatrists are currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental disorder.
That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5
states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome
characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's
cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... mental
disorders are usually associated with significant distress in social,
occupational, or other important activities."
Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and
distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets
of President Trump, so much so that it has affected their cognitive,
affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may
need mental health support. As such, further research is necessary to
investigate the extreme reactions toward President
Trump, in the same way that researchers investigate other extreme social
phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like. This
will shed light on the reality of this emerging folk category that has
been labelled by many as "Trump Derangement
Syndrome."
Dead men tell no tales.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person
has been driven effectively insane due to their
dislike of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion.
The president-elect's every tweet provokes a
firestorm, as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language
consisting solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and
everything Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar
he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up
to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing -
not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that
would be received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president
was a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was
"the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal
people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very
existence of George W. Bush."
"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get
their news from one part of the political spectrum -
the gravest of all. They report that no matter how many times sufferers
in padded cells are presented with flash cards with
the symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time, Newsweek, New York
Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain
unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."
(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part -
meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may
well have it.)
Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote
conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear
"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump
to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it.
Articles in respectable publications written by professors at elite
universities are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump
presidency could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and may very well spell
doom for American civilization.
"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was
about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited.
Many more threatened to leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none
actually did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so
sad!"
The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump
defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies
as nothing more than the blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and
free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of
presidential derangement syndromes is a function of increased
polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at
work in the country today.
We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think
any differently than us. We watch cable news that
affirms what we already think. We read ideological "news" sites that tell
us how good our side is and how bad the other one
is. And on and on and on.
Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who
disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To
say that those who don't share our views are mentally deficient in some way?
What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the
standard response to those with whom you disagree is
that they must be crazy? Nothing good, for sure.
=====
Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have
speculated upon the mental health of President
Donald Trump. Indeed, over 70,000 people self-identifying as "mental
health professionals" have signed a petition declaring
that "Trump is mentally ill and must be removed." In sociological terms,
the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on
President Trump, and to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.
However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of
this "medical gaze." In fact, more and more people
are suggesting that this "medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused
on President Trump's most embittered and partisan
opponents. Some have even suggested that these opponents are experiencing
a specific mental condition-a condition which has
been labelled "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?
Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book
published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA)
known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth
Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and
lists hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is nowhere to be seen. Similarly,
a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE
and Google Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome.
Officially at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable,
or treatable mental disorder.
That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have
convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document.
Indeed, social scientists have long recognized that there are numerous
"folk categories" of mental disorders that are
considered real conditions by the general public, even though they are
not recognized as such in the DSM. These include
categories such as "burnout" or "nervous breakdown."
As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a
real mental condition.
Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"
There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk
category rather than a professional category. As
such, there is currently much armchair speculation about the nature and
existence of TDS, without consensus.
The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford
English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic
combination of opinions, emotions, or behavior." Several commentators
have run with this, putting forth suggestions about
opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS.
Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of
President Trump trigger some people into distorted
opinions, extreme emotions and hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer
Bernard Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples
of TDS among Trump's political opponents, including fainting, vomiting,
students retreating to "safe spaces" and others
demanding "therapy dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses
on opinions, language and cognition, writing in the
LA Times that "sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting of
hyperbole [leading to] a constant state of hysteria...
the afflicted lose touch with reality."
Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the
fainting and screaming characterizing American
Beatlemania in the 1960s. Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme
emotional reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not
based on adoration and admiration, but on fear and loathing.
Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a
malicious slur term used to discredit and
delegitimize criticism of President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris
Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: "The truth
is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who
view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing
more than blind hatred." Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem
is not TDS; our problem is Deranged Trump Self-
Delusion."
In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality
and existence of TDS.
Conclusion
The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists
spend considerable time and energy behind closed
doors pondering over the existence and reality of mental conditions. This
has led the APA to revise the DSM five times since
1952, considerably expanding the list of official mental disorders with
each revision. As far as I am aware, few
psychiatrists are currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental disorder.
That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5
states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome
characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's
cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... mental
disorders are usually associated with significant distress in social,
occupational, or other important activities."
Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and
distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets
of President Trump, so much so that it has affected their cognitive,
affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may
need mental health support. As such, further research is necessary to
investigate the extreme reactions toward President
Trump, in the same way that researchers investigate other extreme social
phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like. This
will shed light on the reality of this emerging folk category that has
been labelled by many as "Trump Derangement
Syndrome."