Discussion:
Words of wisdom
(too old to reply)
Mk5000
2020-01-25 02:52:16 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
seminary.
[...]
IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
sides.
The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
ordinary
and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
fathers
established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
job, they
push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
and to
try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
president in
an upcoming election.
[...]
Fact.
No it isn't.
Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
political assistance.
That's a lie and you know it.
So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
would go beyond that.
There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at
war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny
released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or
clearing it with Congress?
Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans
would never let him get away with it.
Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
Apparently the russkies think it was a fragrant violation

There was one story making the rounds saying that the russkies blocked it
themselves when they realized the clerk who drew it up accidentally
expressed sorrow about the killing of the 49 on the downed plane

Mk5000

Apparently the russkies think it was a fragrant violation

There was one story making the rounds saying that the russkies blocked it
themselves when they realized the clerk who drew it up accidentally
expressed sorrow about the killing of the 49 on the downed plane
Mk5000
2020-01-25 02:55:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mk5000
On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
seminary.
[...]
IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
sides.
The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
ordinary
and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
fathers
established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
job, they
push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
and to
try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
president in
an upcoming election.
[...]
Fact.
No it isn't.
Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
political assistance.
That's a lie and you know it.
So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
would go beyond that.
There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at
war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny
released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or
clearing it with Congress?
Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans
would never let him get away with it.
Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
Apparently the russkies think it was a fragrant violation
There was one story making the rounds saying that the russkies blocked it
themselves when they realized the clerk who drew it up accidentally
expressed sorrow about the killing of the 49 on the downed plane
Mk5000
Apparently the russkies think it was a fragrant violation
There was one story making the rounds saying that the russkies blocked it
themselves when they realized the clerk who drew it up accidentally
expressed sorrow about the killing of the 49 on the downed plane
Because they didn't want to express condolences

Mk5000

My condolences go out to the other families, because I know how they feel,
to lose those close to them right in the holiday season, it's just
devastating.—mayana akbari
Mk5000
2020-01-25 16:42:16 UTC
Permalink
On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
seminary.
[...]
IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
sides.
The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
ordinary
and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
fathers
established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
job, they
push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
and to
try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
president in
an upcoming election.
[...]
Fact.
No it isn't.
Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
political assistance.
That's a lie and you know it.
So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
would go beyond that.
There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at
war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny
released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or
clearing it with Congress?
Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans
would never let him get away with it.
Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
--
That's Karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo
Biden is guilty!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, yoiu believed Trump's bullshit, too, huh? How sad...
Read and learn.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
Facts First: Trump is being hyperbolic here. While the Obama
administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal
assistance to Ukraine, it did provide more than $100 million in security
assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more
flexible after the election.


Obama to Latinos "Punish Our Enemies" (American citizens)
Which begs the question of what does Obama say to other Marxist and
Jihadist friends when he rewards them? What did Obama say when he gave
Iran $150 BILLION DOLLARS? Was Obama again... punishing Americans?
WHY does Obama and why do Democrats hate America so much that they would
ignore National security?
By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security
assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth
of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices
and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
That assistance also included some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
And how does Armor kill the enemy? Hunter Biden was collecting $3
Million for NOT having any experience, with help like that from the
ObamaRegime 120 million won't go very far to helping the Ukrainians.
Perhaps MOST of the money ended up in the hands of Putin.... Obama did
say he would have more flexibility.... And a few Humvee's won't turn the
tide of war. If the EU is behind this help for the Ukrainians, why
didn't NATO fly in to save the Ukrainians from Putin?
Because ukraine wasn’t in nato


For you

I already own it so I won't take it apart
But I think all we need is a decent piece of non gas station turquoise

Mk5000

But Finland joined the EU, and Ukraine will not be permitted to join EU
lite.
—pd shaw
Mk5000
2020-01-25 17:06:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mk5000
On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
seminary.
[...]
IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
sides.
The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
ordinary
and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
fathers
established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
job, they
push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
and to
try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
president in
an upcoming election.
[...]
Fact.
No it isn't.
Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
political assistance.
That's a lie and you know it.
So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
would go beyond that.
There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at
war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny
released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or
clearing it with Congress?
Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans
would never let him get away with it.
Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
--
That's Karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo
Biden is guilty!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, yoiu believed Trump's bullshit, too, huh? How sad...
Read and learn.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
Facts First: Trump is being hyperbolic here. While the Obama
administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal
assistance to Ukraine, it did provide more than $100 million in security
assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more
flexible after the election.
http://youtu.be/XsFR8DbSRQE
http://youtu.be/TeT67BvYzo4
Obama to Latinos "Punish Our Enemies" (American citizens)
Which begs the question of what does Obama say to other Marxist and
Jihadist friends when he rewards them? What did Obama say when he gave
Iran $150 BILLION DOLLARS? Was Obama again... punishing Americans?
WHY does Obama and why do Democrats hate America so much that they would
ignore National security?
By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security
assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth
of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices
and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
That assistance also included some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
And how does Armor kill the enemy? Hunter Biden was collecting $3
Million for NOT having any experience, with help like that from the
ObamaRegime 120 million won't go very far to helping the Ukrainians.
Perhaps MOST of the money ended up in the hands of Putin.... Obama did
say he would have more flexibility.... And a few Humvee's won't turn the
tide of war. If the EU is behind this help for the Ukrainians, why
didn't NATO fly in to save the Ukrainians from Putin?
Because ukraine wasn’t in nato
For you
I already own it so I won't take it apart
But I think all we need is a decent piece of non gas station turquoise
Mk5000
But Finland joined the EU, and Ukraine will not be permitted to join EU
lite.
—pd shaw
Proves that Russia haven’t withdrew because they could not stand to admit
they were sorry

Mk5000

metal from the bell hits Mary-Mengele thru the bucket]
Larry: See? I told you there's too much iron in the water.
Moe: Speak to me, sis. Say a few parables!
Sister Mary-Mengele: [dizzy and hallucinating] I saved 15% on my car
insurance.—mary mengele
Mk5000
2020-01-26 02:49:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mk5000
Post by Mk5000
On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
seminary.
[...]
IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
sides.
The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
ordinary
and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
fathers
established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
job, they
push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
and to
try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
president in
an upcoming election.
[...]
Fact.
No it isn't.
Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
political assistance.
That's a lie and you know it.
So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
would go beyond that.
There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at
war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny
released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or
clearing it with Congress?
Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans
would never let him get away with it.
Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
--
That's Karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo
Biden is guilty!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, yoiu believed Trump's bullshit, too, huh? How sad...
Read and learn.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
Facts First: Trump is being hyperbolic here. While the Obama
administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal
assistance to Ukraine, it did provide more than $100 million in security
assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more
flexible after the election.
http://youtu.be/XsFR8DbSRQE
http://youtu.be/TeT67BvYzo4
Obama to Latinos "Punish Our Enemies" (American citizens)
Which begs the question of what does Obama say to other Marxist and
Jihadist friends when he rewards them? What did Obama say when he gave
Iran $150 BILLION DOLLARS? Was Obama again... punishing Americans?
WHY does Obama and why do Democrats hate America so much that they would
ignore National security?
By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security
assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth
of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices
and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
That assistance also included some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
And how does Armor kill the enemy? Hunter Biden was collecting $3
Million for NOT having any experience, with help like that from the
ObamaRegime 120 million won't go very far to helping the Ukrainians.
Perhaps MOST of the money ended up in the hands of Putin.... Obama did
say he would have more flexibility.... And a few Humvee's won't turn the
tide of war. If the EU is behind this help for the Ukrainians, why
didn't NATO fly in to save the Ukrainians from Putin?
Because ukraine wasn’t in nato
For you
I already own it so I won't take it apart
But I think all we need is a decent piece of non gas station turquoise
Mk5000
But Finland joined the EU, and Ukraine will not be permitted to join EU
lite.
—pd shaw
Proves that Russia haven’t withdrew because they could not stand to admit
they were sorry
Mk5000
metal from the bell hits Mary-Mengele thru the bucket]
Larry: See? I told you there's too much iron in the water.
Moe: Speak to me, sis. Say a few parables!
Sister Mary-Mengele: [dizzy and hallucinating] I saved 15% on my car
insurance.—mary mengele
You will also remember all the artwork where Putin is represented as gollum

Mk5000

http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Eye_of_Sauron

Loading...